[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":122},["ShallowReactive",2],{"pages-685a9ece3159ee7018429d92":3},{"_id":4,"state":5,"name":6,"category":7,"theme":8,"components":9,"keywords":117},"685a9ece3159ee7018429d92","active","Evaluation Framework","replicate","assess_impact_interventions",[10,22,29,37,45,52,59,66,87,110],{"type":11,"index":12,"variation":13,"imageURL":14,"title":15,"description":17,"button":19},"header",0,"image_left","https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/b12cea4b-e983-4b50-a322-8c3145abbdca",{"en_GB":16},"A PROCESS EVALUATION FRAMEWORK",{"en_GB":18},"A common framework developed and applied to evaluate how nine Living Labs and one Policy Lab run their innovation processes.",{"label":20,"URL":21},{"en_GB":21},"",{"type":23,"index":24,"variation":25,"imageURL":21,"title":26,"description":27},"title_and_text",1,"title_description",{"en_GB":21},{"en_GB":28},"Living Labs are widely assessed for their outputs and impacts, yet rarely for how they operate. This process-oriented evaluation framework **shifts the focus from outcomes to dynamics of LL implementation**, capturing the organisational and methodological factors behind collaborative innovation, and enabling learning, comparison and stronger governance.",{"type":30,"index":31,"variation":13,"imageURL":32,"title":33,"description":35},"image_and_text",2,"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/502cffbe-1c10-4bbd-8f8f-a41d1f41359d",{"en_GB":34},"WHY LIVING LAB PROCESSES MATTER",{"en_GB":36},"Living Labs (LLs) are collaborative, user-centred innovation ecosystems that operate in real-life contexts, bringing together users, public and private actors and knowledge institutes to co-create, test and refine solutions. \n\n\nIt is an approach widely adopted in European R&I to tackle complex, place-based challenges.\n\n\nTheir evaluation has traditionally focused on outputs and impacts paying less attention to the processes that generate them.\n\n\nHowever, the Living Lab effectiveness depends not only on the outcomes achieved, but also on how collaboration and learning processes unfold within Living Labs, and on the co-creation dynamics that shape and support them.",{"type":30,"index":38,"variation":39,"imageURL":40,"title":41,"description":43},3,"image_right","https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/42f76382-2d90-4157-8b65-35e075709ace",{"en_GB":42},"FROM OUTCOMES TO PROCESSES",{"en_GB":44},"Rather than measuring only what Living Labs achieve, the Framework shifts the analytical focus from outcomes to the dynamics of LL implementation, examining how organisational and methodological practices interact throughout a Lab's lifecycle. \nIt was built through a two-phase approach:\n- A literature-informed design\n- Iterative participatory validation with Living Lab leaders\nIt provides a structured, comparable way to read the processes behind results: how a Lab is set up and governed, and how it engages stakeholders, co-creates and tests its solutions in real-life settings.",{"type":30,"index":46,"variation":13,"imageURL":47,"title":48,"description":50},4,"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/4312f99d-b062-487d-b74c-8b0babd1d37b",{"en_GB":49},"STRUCTURE OF THE FRAMEWORK",{"en_GB":51},"The framework is a hierarchy of three levels:  **2 dimensions → 6 categories → 25 indicators**\n\n\nThe 2 dimensions are:\n\n\n- **Organisation:** It evaluates the structural and governance conditions that enable LL processes, across three categories: structure and processes, sustainability, and dissemination and knowledge transfer.\n\n- **Methodology**: It captures how stakeholders are engaged, how solutions are co-created and how they are tested, across three categories: stakeholder engagement, co-creation model, and evaluation.",{"type":30,"index":53,"variation":39,"imageURL":54,"title":55,"description":57},5,"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/fa87e689-b154-49e4-a7c0-177b7f0b76ea",{"en_GB":56},"APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK",{"en_GB":58},"- Each Living Lab leader completes a self-assessment questionnaire, answering one question per indicator on a 5-point Likert scale; the answers are aggregated by category and dimension to build a process profile of the Lab.\n- The profile serves learning and continuous improvement, surfacing strengths and the areas that need attention, rather than ranking Labs against one another.\n- Measurements are taken at two moments to track how organisational and methodological maturity evolve: a baseline capturing starting conditions at set-up, and a final measurement taken after the interventions.\n- The same questionnaire and scoring are reused at both points, making baseline and final directly comparable.",{"type":30,"index":60,"variation":13,"imageURL":61,"title":62,"description":64},6,"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/a697c014-644c-4ee6-bc5a-8071458c83d2",{"en_GB":63},"PROCESS EVALUATION RESULTS",{"en_GB":65},"- For each Living Lab, the framework produces a comparable profile across the six categories, visualised as a spider diagram that places the baseline next to the final measurement.\n- The purpose is to support learning, reflection and adaptive improvement over time, results are read as developmental signals of process maturity, not as performance rankings between Labs.\n- The baseline was collected in December 2024 (M28) and the final measurement in April 2026 (M44), using the same questionnaire so the two moments are directly comparable.\n- The complete results, methodology and analysis have been consolidated in the project Report and Presented in the conference paper at ISPIM Conference in Granada.",{"type":67,"index":68,"variation":69,"title":70,"button1":72,"button2":76,"button3":79,"button4":83},"button_group",7,"title_top",{"en_GB":71},"Read more",{"URL":73,"label":74},"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/e3b882fd-8b49-4995-b3e6-740af41e7068",{"en_GB":75},"Conference paper",{"URL":21,"label":77},{"en_GB":78},"Project Report",{"URL":80,"label":81},"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/52bc546e-2dd4-4d12-90a3-50ff4afc4827",{"en_GB":82},"Questionnaire protocol",{"URL":84,"label":85},"https://planeat-project.eu/living_lab_results.html",{"en_GB":86},"LL results (baseline & final)",{"type":88,"index":89,"variation":69,"title":90,"contact1":92,"contact2":98,"contact3":104},"contacts",8,{"en_GB":91},"CONTACTS",{"imageURL":93,"name":94,"description":96},"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/f8c0109c-ec97-4517-8e0e-a21a9a592b75",{"en_GB":95},"Eva Martinez - eva.martinez@icons.it",{"en_GB":97},"Expert - Social Innovation",{"imageURL":99,"name":100,"description":102},"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/37a5b195-80ec-4965-a6dc-dc91da8f35f1",{"en_GB":101},"Marco Petazzoni - marco.petazzoni@icons.it",{"en_GB":103},"Junior officer - Social innovation",{"imageURL":105,"name":106,"description":108},"https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/23fa268e-b79c-4a35-aa4d-ecb747e8e0cf",{"en_GB":107},"Silvia Prazzoli - silvia.prazzoli@icons.it",{"en_GB":109},"Communication & Outreach officer",{"type":111,"index":112,"variation":113,"URL":114,"imageURL":115,"title":116},"image_with_link",9,"title_top_image_bottom","https://www.icons.it/","https://planeateu.retool.com/api/file/7043c86a-232c-43df-a6c7-f401ba0dbce0",{"en_GB":21},[118,119,120,121],"living lab","evaluation framework","social innovation","research methodology",1787919833938]